Lift up your eyes and look at the heavens

Although the Greek philosophers worshiped the planet gods, they sought to explain the workings of nature without gods. The Greeks were unable to reach a consensus on a rational foundation for a godless science during the classical age. The problem they struggled with was: how could they invent science if matter is always changing its properties? After three hundred years of debates, Aristotle suggested that they just assume that the properties of matter are fixed - not emergent. Seven hundred years ago, the Catholic scholastics chose Aristotle's assumption as the foundation for Western science. Over the centuries, Western scientists built a great structure on Aristotle's ancient idea. Modern teachers instruct his assumption by inference, never explicitly, since it is the basis for the scientific structure: the definitions, ways of measuring and mathematical laws of physics. Science is faith based, since it depends on the faith that the properties of matter are not emergent.

A scientist could argue that their system works, therefore, whatever assumptions were made long ago must be valid. Their hypotheses are rigorously and repeatedly tested with precision measurements.

The scientific first principle is the elementary, historical, fundamental assumption for the scientific structure. When scientists test a theory, they use the definitions, units of measuring and mathematical laws that circularly depend on their assumption. Peter, a disciple of Jesus, prophesied that in the last days false teachers will come saying "panta outos diamenei" all things remain the same in being. Peter's prediction has come true since all scientists assume that the properties of matter are NOT emergent.

If matter were changing itself, scientists could adjust their system to work locally and in nearby times. Why? The scientific instruments, mathematics and most measuring units would shift together with the changing matter. However, they could never measure the distance to the stars or contrive a valid earth-history. A scientist could insist that after many tests, they are certain that 1 + 1 = 2. If every atom were changing itself, 1 + 1 would always equal two - yet no ancient object (numbered 1, 2 or any other number)  would be identical to modern objects. There would not be a single constant, not a single independent variable, not even a single mathematical formula that could describe the history of a universe where matter is always changing relationally. In relational change, everything changes together - in parallel.

We actually see the universe's history at many ranges with optics, without even the need for mathematical theories. We can directly compare the light from ancient matter with modern matter. No perpetual motion atoms gleam from hundreds of billions of ancient galaxies. In general, the farther from the past we see the light, the more those ancient atoms shone with minuscule frequencies - compared to modern matter. Despite this visible evidence, all scientists assume that atoms are perpetual motion machines. They must assume this because they use atoms to define invariant seconds and then bootstrap thousands of precision measuring units and mathematical formulas from their perpetual-motion primary definition. It is impossible to define precise units for time, energy and matter without assuming perpetual motion at some level. The idea that the properties of matter are not emergent is the historical foundation for the entire scientific edifice, the definitions, units, formulas and methods. If this assumption is false, the scientific structure will someday fail catastrophically.

Peter also predicted that the end time false teachers will obfuscate two kinds of evidences with the idea that all things remain the same in being. They would ignore the evidence that the heavens are ekpali. Ek means to come out from a point of origin. Palai has to do with orbits, vibrations, repetitive events. We can see how the galaxies formed. Indeed they are ekpalai - the stars came out long ago. Peter also prophesied that they will ignore the evidence that the earth "synistemi ek hydor." The earth and its water were originally together in one place, bonding together. However, the water came out, ek, separated from the land. Then at some point (aorist tense) the earth destroyed itself with overflowing water.


The evidence for the separation of earth and water is overwhelming. Billions of cubic kilometers of rock were ground into sediments and layered as sedimentary rocks from a watery slurry. Interestingly, the deep oceans do not contain layered, ground up rocks like the continents. A volcanic expansion seam runs the length of every ocean. The continents fit together like jig saw pieces, but only on a minuscule earth. We observe volcanic crust forming every year in the undersea expansion seam. To preserve their assumption that the properties of matter are not emergent, scientists invent a mythical subduction that allegedly swallows the earth's crust. Supposedly, millions of square kilometers of sea floor have wormed their way into the cauldron of the earth's interior. Marine oozes and scraped off sea mounts were allegedly swallowed without a trace. Yet the "subduction trenches" have undisturbed, soft, layered sediments. They contain no scarps, volcanic vents or any other evidences of the alleged subduction. Why do scientists invent magic? They must preserve their first principle, since it is the basis for their entire empirical system.

What about the evidence that the heavens are ekpalai? The Bible uses the term raqiya for the early heavens. Raqiya is the noun form of the verb to pound out, to spread out - the place that is spreading out. What an appropriate term! Ancient galaxies shot out discreet clumps packed densely with stars. These clumps accelerated outward and spread out as billions of ancient galaxies grew into huge, local, growth spirals. Every atom changed its light frequencies as the galaxies grew. What is visible could only happen if the properties of matter are always changing as a relation. What is visible is a violation of every law, every definition and almost every  scientific measuring unit.

Hubble UDF # 3180Here is a face on galaxy: # 3180 from the Hubble Ultra Deep Field. This galaxy is not particularly distant, relative to most of the galaxies in the HUDF. (The HUDF has 10,000 galaxies in a nine square minute area.) Notice that the arms are made of discrete, equally spaced clumps. At the end of one of the arms sits a yellow clump. On average, the atoms in this ancient galaxy shone at 53% of the light frequencies of modern atoms. In billions of closer galaxies we see how the arms have rotated around more as the atomic clocks accelerate AND the star orbits also accelerate outward.

Scientists are about to launch another space telescope (Herschel) and install a better camera (that can see lower frequency light) in the Hubble. What telescopes have seen so far is a biblical cosmic history and evidence for biblical physics. The law of biblical physics is that everything in creation is changing (phthora) in an orderly (hupotasso) way. Hundreds of billions of galaxies visibly support biblical physics. Not a single ancient galaxy gleams with the light of perpetual motion atoms. In order to ignore what is visible, scientists fill the universe with magic, things no one has ever detected anywhere. They propose invisible matter and unnatural, vacuous forces that allegedly adjust the frequencies of all ancient light passing through the void. The scientific universe is 99% invisible. All the invisible things were mathematically contrived to protect the creed of all scientists - the idea that the properties of matter are not emergent.

Lift up your eyes and look at the heavens. The raqiya reveals the great power and glory of God. He is so wise that He even defeats science, the system of reasoning and measuring constructed on the assumption of a pagan Greek.

Return to godsriddle main page
This document is under a Creative Commons License by Victor McAllister. What does that mean?
Last modified on January 31, 2009