The Absurdity of Modern Astronomy

Scientific cosmic histories are the most absurd stories every assembled in the history of myths. Scientists claim the universe is approximately 99% invisible. Allegedly it was formed when a tiny spec of vacuum exploded. They claim that every galaxy is surrounded by a halo of dark matter that outweighs the visible matter in the galaxy. This undetectable stuff is invisible because it is transparent to light. They tell these myths to force their physics on billions of uncooperative galaxies. They tell ad hoc stories about black holes where light can’t escape. They even claim that dark energy pulls energy out of the vacuum to accelerate the stretching of the vacuum. As the vacuum expands, galaxies accelerate away from each other at near light speed as they stand still relative to local vacuums. Supposedly the expanding vacuum changes all light frequencies passing through the void. No one has detected anything remotely like these things in any laboratory.


All these ad hoc stories were contrived to protect an elementary assumption, the basic assumption upon which western science was constructed. A pagan philosopher was the first to propose this assumption. Fifteen hundred years later the Catholic scholars adopted Aristotle’s metaphysics and taught it in Western schools for hundreds of years. Western science was constructed on the elementary assumption that the essence of substance is unchanging. Generations of scientists invented matheamtical definitions for things like mass, energy and time and circular ways of measuring these things mathematically. Their methods and mathematics are circular because they depend on the assumption that matter is not changing as it ages.  They never examine or test this assumption because it is the basis for their enetire structured system. Yet anyone who believes their eyes can see that all matter changes as it ages, because we can visually compare the past to the present in the distant sky.


The following essays are labeled as Against. The essays are not against the visible evidence, but the ad hoc stories astronomers have contrived to protect their creed.

Against Invisible Matter

Against Relativity

Against Space-time

Against Black Holes